Rhamnus purshiana now Frangula

Discussion in 'Plants: Nomenclature and Taxonomy' started by Eric La Fountaine, Nov 25, 2008.

  1. Eric La Fountaine

    Eric La Fountaine Contributor Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    3,510
    Likes Received:
    233
    Location:
    sw USA
    UBCBG accessions of Rhamnus purshiana are being relabelled as Frangula purshiana. This change is based on Generic limits in Rhamnus L. s.l. (Rhamnaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence phylogenies by K. Bolmgren and B. Oxelman published in Taxon, Volume 53, Number 2, 1 May 2004 , pp. 383-1(-381)

     
  2. Michael F

    Michael F Paragon of Plants Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    11,144
    Likes Received:
    361
    Location:
    Britain zone 8/9
    Frangula has been moved in and out of Rhamnus like a yo-yo over the last 240 years . . . I wonder if this will really be the last move??

    Presume you're doing the same for Frangula californica and any others in this (sub)genus you have?
     
  3. Ron B

    Ron B Paragon of Plants 10 Years

    Messages:
    20,765
    Likes Received:
    581
    Location:
    WA USA (Z8)
    Genetic analysis used this time may carry more weight.
     
  4. Eric La Fountaine

    Eric La Fountaine Contributor Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    3,510
    Likes Received:
    233
    Location:
    sw USA
    The only other Rhamnus species listed in the garden's database is Rhamnus alnifolia. I am not quite sure about the placement of that species. It was not mentioned in the article and seems to remain in the genus Rhamnus according to GRIN and others.
    http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/splist.pl?10359
     
  5. Michael F

    Michael F Paragon of Plants Forums Moderator 10 Years

    Messages:
    11,144
    Likes Received:
    361
    Location:
    Britain zone 8/9
    Yep, Rhamnus alnifolia has always been placed in (sub)genus Rhamnus, so it won't be moved.
     

Share This Page