The only difference I've noticed is that Bloodgoods I see are grafted and the Atropurpureum aren't but what's the other difference between the two? Thank you very much
Bloodgood is a form of Atropurpureum selected for its good colour and its tendancy to hold the colour well throughout the growing season. In practice a seedling grown Atropurpureum might be very similar to a Bloodgood or it may be quite different, particularly in how long it retains the dark red colour. (I believe many nurseries use Bloodgood seeds to grow their Atropurpureums, so if you are lucky the difference may be minimal) Hope that is some help.
According to Japanese Maples Third Edition, by JD Vertrees and Peter Gregory, Atropurpureum could be any of a number of red cultivars. According to this source, "because many nurseries have used this name for any red-leaved seedling selection, it has become so diluted as to be meaningless." Further "the original plant of this name was probably an excellent clone originating from the old nursery of Constant Wattez...." So, Atropurpureum, which has also been called Blood Leaf, means a red Acer palmatum.
There are more differences. The colour of 'Atropurpureum' is more vivid, the colour of 'Bloodgood' is more monotonous, the colour of 'Bloodgood' is darker, the colour of 'Atropurpureum' is not so dark and with a light green undertone. The colour of 'Atropurpureum' changes several times in the growing season, from deep purple to bronze, and bronze-green, almost green in late summer and intense scarlet in fall, the colour of 'Bloodgood' does not change throughout the growing season, it is all the summer the same dark, deep red. The habit is quite different. 'Atropurpureum' does have a tree-like habit, with layering branches, which give a typical japanese impression, 'Bloodgood' is a little tree but with no layering branches and does not generate this typical japanese impression. The fall colour from 'Atropurpureum' is an outstandig scarlet, the fall colour from 'Bloodood' is normaly not so outstanding. In the Netherlands 'Atropurpureum' get's the highest award for garden beauty, three stars, there is no other a.p. which get this award. But, try to get this garden-beauty, and you will find out, it is almost impossible. Nearely nobody have the original, but you can get in every garden-center and every nursery a cheap copy, witch seems to look like the original, but really lacks all the outstandig qualities of the genuine 'Atropurpureum'. Some pics attached, showing the changing leaf colour throughout the season. The first four pics are from april and may, pics fife, six and seven are from the end of august and the last two pics are from the middle of october.
Dan, Beautiful tree , thank you for sharing the photos and description. It's hard to understand why it is not propagated more and easily available. Some nice photos for the photo gallery www.botanicalgarden.ubc.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=51180 ?
I would guess it's for the reason Winterhaven cited above (quoting Vertrees, I think): "... because many nurseries have used this name ['Atropurpureum'] for any red-leaved seedling selection, it has become so diluted as to be meaningless."
According to Van Gelderen's "Maples of the World" the cultivar A. p. 'Atropurpureum' is propagated by layering from a tree in the Netherlands. Can understand it being less readily available with the layering method, maybe along with high demand. Guessing maybe they want to keep the tree on it's own roots, rather than risk possibly diluting it's characteristics with grafting. Esveld lists an 'Atropurpureum Wattez', so maybe the effort has been made to distinguish the cultivar from others and ease availability.
I guess this may be interpreted as an argument against giving cultivars Latin-sounding names in the first place. Though one does rebel at market-friendly alternatives like 'Scarlet Shortcake.'
Yes, that's for sure Kaspian. Agree Sam, confused too when i look in the mirror in the morning and recognize the face, but can't remember the name.
"... because many nurseries have used this name ['Atropurpureum'] for any red-leaved seedling selection, it has become so diluted as to be meaningless." Yes, that’s the problem! It is a shame! @ chimera I have some doubts if the pictures hier: http://www.botanicalgarden.ubc.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=51180 show true ‘Atropurpureum’, the lobes of the a.p. on the pics seprates to far to the leaf base. The leaves of ‘Atropurpureum’ are not so deeply cut. The colour of the ‘Atropurpureum’ is not so light-red, but more purple-red. “Esveld lists an 'Atropurpureum Wattez', so maybe the effort has been made to distinguish the cultivar from others and ease availability.” Esveld says that ‘Atropurpureum Wattez’ is the old type of ‘Atropurpureum’, from the 19th century: http://www.esveld.nl/htmldiaen/a/acpawa.htm They offer both, ‘Atropurpureum’ and ‘Atropurpureum Wattez’ and I take it, that the ‘Atropurpureum’ is the high awardet plant, which was here in Europe the most famous a. p. in the time after war, for several decades. Here are some other pics yet, made yesterday. You can see that the outher leaves are purple red, but the leaves inside the tree are more bronze. That is very typical for the true ‘Atropurpureum’. Only in the first weeks, when leaves are new unfolded, all leaves are purple red, you can see on the first pic in my first comment above (made five weeks ago). When season progress, the whole tree becomes more and more bronze and later bronze-green from inside, until late sommer, the tree will look like you can see on pics five, six and seven in my comment above. This double colour, inside bronze or bronze-green, outside purple red, gives the tree his special beauty. It is a vivid colour, not monotonous. In my opinion the 'Atropurpureum' from Esveld is realy 'Atropurpureum'. I bought a little plant this spring and this plant shows the qualitys of 'Atropurpureum', in growth habit, colour and leaf shape.
The diluting of the 'Atropurpureum' Maple was probably our fault in the US. It is a real shame to see what has happened to the old European plant but then again the Europeans have not always helped that plant either. Years ago I found an 'Atropurpureum superbum' in a specialty nursery in Oregon that I liked a lot. When compared to the Esveld 'Attraction' the Superbum and their Attraction are not the same plant, not even close for Spring color and in growth habit as one tree is technically a standard (Attraction) and the Suberbum is a semi-dwarf. My tree which was propagated in 1985 is still only less than 9 feet (3m) tall. My tree starts out in the Spring as a black red with leaf sizes about the same as my ‘Shojo’ and has deeply divided leaves, divided well beyond 1/3 to 2/3 the length of the lobes in several leaves but also can yield palmate shaped leaves as well with divisions less than 1/3 the length of the lobes. Then again my Wada form ‘Tsuma beni’ has done the same thing for years and even now has two distinct leaf shapes on the tree at the same time. All new flushes of new growth will have the deeply divided leaves, divided almost all the way to the palm of the leaf like the Superbum. Years ago it was concluded that some Maples were felt to be atropurpureum then and people ran with it such as calling a Maple Acer palmatum atropurpureum Musashino or Acer palmatum atropurpureum Novum. It was not long ago and still may be that there was a Maple named 'Atropurpureum Novum'. It was the Europeans that used this spelling with both words capitalized. So, the question was that a few people had was is the European 'Atropurpureum Novum' the same plant as the US nursery industry plant Novum? Funny thing that when we want to market the Maple in the US we dropped off the atropurpureum part of the name and just left it as Novum or Superbum or Ō kagami, Musashino and so on. In the mid to late 80's in the US a rash of seedling plants were being sold in the nursery trade as being Atropurpureum. This is where things went haywire in that many nurseries all called any red Maple an atropurpureum even when the Maple may have been a rubrum group red or a shojo group red or a nigrum group red instead of being an actual atropurpureum group red. One prominent wholesale nursery at this time was calling their red form deeply divided Maples Red Ribbon Leaf and Ron B knows who I am referring to. Same nursery that called their unnamed and seedling red dissectums Red Lace Leaf. A few years ago I bought a 'Red Emperor', same plant that Don Kleim got through Red Maple nursery before I knew him prior to it being named (was called "Improved Bloodgood 2" at the time) with a Red Ribbon Leaf label on it. The experimental plant “Improved Bloodgood 1” later became Emperor I. [Don had them both to have in the nursery on a monitoring trial basis before 1982 that I am aware of. Maybe Ed can shed more light on these two Maples but it was rather common for Don to have the plant long before it was ever released to other nurseryman, knowing full well he would not propagate the Maple for resale.] Bloodgood is not a universal good Fall color producer. Many but not all of the red Maples that turn green during the Summer do have a propensity to yield more scarlet and crimson tones than the Maples that do not green out. For us Bloodgood never turns a green color during the Summer, there is enough red overtone left in the leaves that may prevent it from being a good Fall color producer but in some areas in Oregon and Washington as well, cannot forget them here, Bloodgood can yield some good scarlet coloration that holds well on the tree but it requires an early and even decrease in cooler Fall temperatures to see it (abrupt cooling will not work). We do not get that here in the Fall. You guys still have not realized what I wrote when I talked about ‘Kiyohime akame’ still producing new growth in December and by mid to late February is leafed out all over again. We are not talking about a long time period that this Maple does not have leaves on it. Who else sees 10 1/2 months of leaves with color on a Maple? I've seen the 'Atropurpureum' in Europe and although it will not color up as well for us here in the Central Valley I can say with confidence that the Europeans have good reason to adore that Maple and yes, it is better left on its own roots. Layering, air-layering and rooted cuttings still seem to work best for that Maple. Perhaps using red seedling understock may not hurt it in the Pacific Northwest like green seedling rootstocks can and have. Jim
Dan, thanks again for describing more of the characteristics and Esveld as being a possible source. Kind of wondering what the underleaf looks like. Yes, also noticed the lobe divisions on the photo gallery tree and understand your concerns, more information about that tree from NyxLimit might be helpful. Maybe a separate thread would benefit the photo gallery and readers best. Thanks to Mr. Shep's contribution, also. All interesting information and good that Imperfect Ending brought up the question.
I read this whole question and the answers. The funny thing is I was out taking cuttings from my 'Bloodgood' or what I have thought was a bloodgood. My tree has Red, reg and green, pure green and everything in between for the colour of leaves at this present time. I am more confused as to what I actually have. I want to properly tag my cuttings when they take root. I posted Pics , I don't see them. I hope they show on this post.
Good morning Donald and welcome to the maples forum. Your posting to this thread shows the constant confusion between Bloodgood and Atropurpureum has not gone away. Over here in the UK Atropurpureum is sold everywhere as basically a purple red maple. On it's own roots, and so easily propagated from seed by the large nurseries. Bloodgood is not so often seen and tbh to get a true Bloodgood is often quite difficult. Now looking at your photos IMO you do not have a Bloodgood. It should stay a deep red all Summer and especially in full sun as yours appears to be. Even Atropurpureum does not turn that green in full sun. But it is far closer to that of Atropurpureum. Now I see you have read the questions and answers on this thread and I point to the one by @mr.shep His posting highlights the problem identifying a perceived Bloodgood or a group of Atropurpureum 's produced in the 80's in the US. Your tree appears to be an 80's maple, so I would suspect you have a 'superbum' or maybe a 'Novum'. But the former are my thoughts at what you have. 12ft tall and a semi dwarf, upright in structure. To add that ID 's of maples is so hard these days, especially as the market has been flooded internationally with so many variants of a type, that you may find that a closest guesstimate is all you may have. So those are my thoughts, I hope others will chip in to help you.
Price difference? In short, the extra time frame involved for the young graft to grow above the root stock. So add an extra 2 year min. before it is even sold in a one gallon pot. Meanwhile that seedling variety is already triple the size and many buyers go for size alone. They are not realizing all the variances such as long term size maturity, long term colour and fall colours, etc.
Dan gave a really good description, with photos, of 'Atropurpureum' the cultivar, which Mr. Shep gave a great description of what happened. I don't think there's any way to know what Donald's tree is, except to say it's very pretty. A fine tree, I don't think it's the real 'Bloodgood' or 'Atropurpureum'. There were thousands of red selections that were propagated and sold as one or the other of these, with or without single quotes. Maybe this one was selected for doing well in the heat of Texas. It's standard for red maples to go green or greenish on the shaded parts. It looks to me that is the case here. Esveld still has the 'Atropurpureum' cultivar in stock, though I'd bet money it's grafted and no longer a layer. I know that Dick van der Maat has the real cultivar. That would mean it's potentially available at Poppins Plants, who serves as a UK importer for Esveld, (note this is a very new establishment, so time will tell how things work out), and Hippopottering gets material from Dick, so Pat may be selling it.
Thank you very much. That was a very thorough answer. I appreciate all the thought and information you gave me. I never get that much information from a question and the information on this forum is above anything else I've seen, a wonderful and educational site.
I nearly always compare the size when purchasing a plant. Now that I am retired and do not have to worry about money for my future I want a particular tree, something I've fallen in love with. That's the problem with Maples, so many to love.
Thank you, I will check these sellers out. Shipping to U.S may make it unreasonable but I'll enjoy just seeing what they have. Thanks again