Separate names with a comma.
The closest I've come to an ID is Dypsis lutescens, but there's a couple of those close by, and the trunks are different and the leaflets on the...
Thank you Martin - I'll start looking. I thought it would be tricky without knowing the stamen arrangement.
This picture, a0000009.gif, is at the following link:...
Thank you so much - I've been looking at A & B so frequently. A doesn't look like anything Ive seen before, I didn't expect such a quick answer....
OK - thanks for the info - much appreciated
Thank yu for that info - I'll go back in a couple of weeks.
Well, the attached 3 cones were under the same tree. I think the tree was Pinus roxburghii (Cone C) but would appreciate any correction and ID of...
Thank you so much, and yes - cm, not mm. Am very happy re P. bungeana
These cones were under a Pinus bungeana. There’s a Pinus maximartinezii next to them. These trees had no cones on the tree to be able to match....
Thank you Michael -
The attached photo of the cone with pale apophyses was taken in 2013, labeled Pinus halepensis. All other P. halepensis I've seen look like the...
